Skip to content

GPT-6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: API cost

Both models are in our efficient tier, based on how OpenAI and Google (Gemini API) describe them. GPT-6 Luna is cheaper in all 5 standard workloads priced on both.

The biggest difference is the cached-prompt assistant workload: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs £807.90 a month against £208.78 for GPT-6 Luna, 3.9× as much. 61% of that difference comes from output tokens: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite charges £1.87 per million of them, against £0.373. The gap is narrowest for the long-document questions workload, where GPT-6 Luna costs 68% less.

Prices on this page last verified on Sources

Providers publish these prices in US dollars. Pound figures are converted at £1 = US$1.3403, the Bank of England spot rate for .

Monthly cost at five standard workloads

GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite monthly cost by workload
WorkloadTokens in / outGPT-6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteDifference a monthPricier byMost of the gap
Short chat10,000 requests a day1,000 / 300£56.73£238.29£181.55 (GPT-6 Luna cheaper)4.2×Output tokens
Long-document questions1,000 requests a day30,100 / 500£73.98£233.29£159.31 (GPT-6 Luna cheaper)3.2×Input tokens
Bulk tagging200,000 requests a day400 / 10£204.25£658.12£453.88 (GPT-6 Luna cheaper)3.2×Input tokens
Long-form writing500 requests a day1,500 / 3,000£18.72£90.21£71.49 (GPT-6 Luna cheaper)4.8×Output tokens
Cached-prompt assistant20,000 requests a day8,000 / 400£208.78£807.90£599.12 (GPT-6 Luna cheaper)3.9×Output tokens

Published prices side by side

Per million tokens, for the first price tier of each model (GPT-6 Luna: prompts up to 272k input tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: all prompt lengths).

GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite prices per million tokens
PriceGPT-6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input£0.0746£0.224
Cached input£0.00746£0.0224
Output£0.373£1.87
Batch input£0.0373£0.112
Batch cached input£0.00373£0.0112
Batch output£0.187£0.933

Why these two are compared

We only compare models in the same capability tier, read from each provider’s own description of the model. Both are in our efficient tier:

  • GPT-6 Luna: Provider text: "Our most efficient model for focused, high-volume tasks." Described as efficient and high-volume: efficient. developers.openai.com (checked )
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Provider text: "Our fastest, most cost-effective 3.5 model for high-throughput execution." Fastest and most cost-effective: efficient. aistudio.google.com (checked )

Workload assumptions

Short chat

Input tokens per request
Part of the promptTokensCachedWhy
Instructions300NoShort instructions, treated as uncached.
Message and recent turns700NoChanges with every request.
Total1,000None cached
Requests a day: 10,000
A popular in-app assistant.
Output tokens per request: 300
A reply of about 220 words.
Batch API: not used
Real-time replies.

These are stated assumptions for illustration, not measurements. Cached parts are assumed to be read from the prompt cache on every request. Token counts are the same for every model, although providers count tokens differently. Use the calculator to try your own figures.

Long-document questions

Input tokens per request
Part of the promptTokensCachedWhy
Document30,000NoAbout 22,000 words, different every time.
Question100NoOne or two sentences.
Total30,100None cached
Requests a day: 1,000
A research or legal team asking questions of whole documents.
Output tokens per request: 500
An answer of about 370 words.
Batch API: not used
Real-time answers.

These are stated assumptions for illustration, not measurements. Cached parts are assumed to be read from the prompt cache on every request. Token counts are the same for every model, although providers count tokens differently. Use the calculator to try your own figures.

Bulk tagging

Input tokens per request
Part of the promptTokensCachedWhy
Instructions and labels300NoShort instructions, treated as uncached.
Item100NoA short text.
Total400None cached
Requests a day: 200,000
Items such as tickets, reviews or records tagged as they arrive.
Output tokens per request: 10
One label.
Batch API: not used
Tagged as items arrive.

These are stated assumptions for illustration, not measurements. Cached parts are assumed to be read from the prompt cache on every request. Token counts are the same for every model, although providers count tokens differently. Use the calculator to try your own figures.

Long-form writing

Input tokens per request
Part of the promptTokensCachedWhy
Brief and style notes1,500NoDifferent for each piece.
Total1,500None cached
Requests a day: 500
Articles, reports or long emails drafted a day.
Output tokens per request: 3,000
About 2,200 words.
Batch API: not used
Drafts are wanted straight away.

These are stated assumptions for illustration, not measurements. Cached parts are assumed to be read from the prompt cache on every request. Token counts are the same for every model, although providers count tokens differently. Use the calculator to try your own figures.

Cached-prompt assistant

Input tokens per request
Part of the promptTokensCachedWhy
Instructions and tool definitions6,000YesThe same on every request, so read from the prompt cache.
Conversation and request2,000NoChanges with every request.
Total8,00075% cached
Requests a day: 20,000
A busy assistant with long instructions and tool definitions.
Output tokens per request: 400
A reply of about 300 words.
Batch API: not used
Real-time replies.

These are stated assumptions for illustration, not measurements. Cached parts are assumed to be read from the prompt cache on every request. Token counts are the same for every model, although providers count tokens differently. Use the calculator to try your own figures.

Your traffic looks different? Enter your own figures in the calculator.

Sources

Sources: aistudio.google.com (checked ); developers.openai.com (checked )

Providers publish these prices in US dollars. Pound figures are converted at £1 = US$1.3403, the Bank of England spot rate for .

Prices are list prices as each provider publishes them, used unchanged. How the figures are calculated: methodology.